• Study 1:
  Name :
• An evaluation of an action learning program(Bob Dick)
  
  Aims:
   to achieve both action (that is, change) and research (that is, understanding).
   Check the effective of action learning learning through good processes and appropriate participation
   It tries to collect adequate data, and interpret it well.
   Clarifying roles of using action learning programm.
  
  Instrmunt tools
   The interviews(explained role in some detail. It made clear what use would be made of the data they provided to us).
   Group interviews(to allow more systematic data collection and more interpretation of the data by participants.).
   Comparing participants and other stakeholders(In comparing our data and interpretations to those provided by the other evaluator)
   Meeting with providers(included program designers, project facilitators, and presenters use to providing information about these program)

• Study 2 :
  Name :
  Interactive Whiteboard Evaluation (2000)
• Brief description :
  This evaluation done by Anna Smith with MirandaNet Fellows, Boston Spa Comprehensive School . It is about establishing the interactive whiteboard in the school , the impression of using it as a technology tool and the technical problem the teacher faced .
  The evaluation techniques :
• Interview .
• Questionnaire .
  The aspects that the Questionnaire covered are :
  1- way to present the information .( the teacher was amazed in how it present the information . They think that it can motivate students understanding)
  2- space that it need ( It take a large space m and we have limit space in the class room)
  3- light (too much light in the room as a consequence of having no blinds making the image difficult to see)
  4- user friendly
  5- easy to use ( so it took five to ten minutes to feel confident enough to use it in the classroom)
  6- setting up it
  7- Preparation Time to learn how to use it .